The man leading the congressional attack on President Trump, Congressman Jerry Nadler looks to have a major conflict on his hands which screams ethics violation.
Michael Nadler, works for Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, a New York based law firm.
What is significant about this job is that that office has repeatedly sued President Trump, including on behalf of CNN reporter Jim Acosta, Big League Politics reported.
“Congressman Jerry Nadler has a big conflict,” our source tells Big League Politics in Washington, D.C.
“His son (Michael Nadler) got a job with Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP in 2018. That’s convenient because Jerry Nadler and the Democrats just won control of the House in 2018.
Gibson Dunn & Crutcher hire Jerry’s son and Gibson Dunn & Crutcher are the main Nemesis against Trump and the Trump Administration on numerous lawsuits.
Now the Nadler family will gain access to thousands of Trump documents via Jerry’s subpoenas!,” our insider stated.
Gibson Dunn represented CNN’s Jim Acosta in his lawsuit against the Trump White House after President Trump revoked Jim Acosta’s press credentials for creating a disturbance in a press briefing and making physical contact with a female White House intern.
In December Gibson Dunn announced that it was representing the Center for Reproductive Rights in its lawsuit against the Trump State Department concerning abortion language in Trump administration human rights reports.
Gibson Dunn’s global co-chairman Ted Boutros sued President Trump in a bid to protect the DACA Dreamer program.
Such an arrangement — Jerry Nadler investigating Trump with his son’s firm trying to get access to documents in other cases — violates ethics rules for federal investigators.
The Federalist Papers noted that Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., one of the top attorneys at the firm, filed a lawsuit against President Trump over DACA and has tweeted many things against the president including claiming the President was “obstructing justice.”
Yes, the President can and is obstructing Justice. https://t.co/thlQwohQ9v
— Ted Boutrous (@BoutrousTed) June 4, 2018
2 is clearly constitutional. It avoids all the purported problems of interfering with the president’s activities while in office and would toll the statute of limitations. The Supreme Court would agree. https://t.co/8Svh5bsUSU
— Ted Boutrous (@BoutrousTed) August 25, 2018
Let’s come together on this: We need a level-headed President. https://t.co/QEB4Px6KW2
— Ted Boutrous (@BoutrousTed) September 11, 2018
More obstruction of justice, on the record, right out in the open, by President Trump and his White House. https://t.co/3seoglSXnm
— Ted Boutrous (@BoutrousTed) March 5, 2019